Legal Opinion

Wahr Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1952No. Appeals, 49 to 57PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,

The Pennsylvania Proration Act of July 2, 1937, P. L. 2762, 20 PS 844, provides that the United States estate tax shall be equitably prorated “except in a case where a testator otherwise directs in his will.” The single question is whether testatrix has so otherwise directed.

Corinne M. Wahr, the testatrix, by her will bequeathed a piano to a named legatee and $50,000 to a friend: The residue she directed: “. . . shall be divided into twelve- equal.. shares or parts, and such twelve shares, or parts. T give and bequeath as follows. . . .”…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mellon EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Harvey EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Stadtfeld EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Jeffery's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Bolstad v. Wells Fargo Bank American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Estate of ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Buckhantz v. DavidsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. In re the Construction of the Will of ShubertNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Roy B. Thompson, Jr., of the Will of Roy B. Thompson, Deceased v. Earl R. Wiseman, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API