Legal Opinion

Kinney v. Kinney

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 19, 1935No. 6 Div. 690PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The bill in this suit was filed in equity by appellee against appellants and seeks a reformation. It alleges that appellant H. H. Kinney defrauded him, by which he was in-, duced to accept a deed conveying property, other than that agreed upon.

The substance of the bill is that complainant owned the property in question, and was desirous of securing a loan on it, hut his wife was away in a hospital, so he deeded the property to H. H. Kinney, and took from him a mortgage on it to be used by him for the loan. After the mortgage became due, and was unpaid, and not as a part of the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Craft v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  2. Stone v. HaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
  3. Brinkmeyer v. BetheaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  4. Early & Lane v. OwensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  5. Gilley v. DenmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Atlas Assur. Co. v. ByrneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Skelton v. TynerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  3. Monroe v. MartinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  4. Brewer v. StanleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Stevens v. WhaleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API