Legal Opinion
In re SDG&E Consolidated Cases
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 19, 2021No. 3:17-cv-02433Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IN RE SDG&E CONSOLIDATED Case No. 17-cv-02433-BAS-JLB CASES. Consolidated Case Nos. 12 (1) 18-cv-01389-BAS-JLB 13 (2) 18-cv-01390-BAS-JLB (3) 18-cv-01561-BAS-JLB 14 15 ORDER 16 (1) DENYING DEFENDANT’S 17 RULE 12(b)(1) MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 115); 18 19 (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL 20 NOTICE (ECF No. 115-10); 21 22 (3) DENYING DEFENDANT’S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS 23 (ECF No. 122-1); and 24 (4) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 25 MOTION FOR SUMMARY 26 JUDGMENT (ECF No. 115). 27 28 1 This action arises…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.