Legal Opinion
Ulmer v. Dana Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 2, 2002No. 3:00 CV 7659PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KATZ, District Judge.
Pending before this Court are Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 28) and Defendants’ motion to strike inadmissible evidence (Doc. No. 50). For the following reasons the motion to strike will be denied, and the motion for summary judgment will be granted in part and denied in part.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Isaac R. Ulmer, an African American man, began employment as a vacation relief worker with Defendant Dana Corporation (“Dana”) in July 1994, and was hired as a full-time machine worker in November 1994. Defendant A1 Rohrbacher was Mr.…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lewis v. Horace Mann InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
- Nuss v. Central Iowa Binding Corp.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2003
- Bolls v. South-Western Thomson LearningDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
- Duncan v. Lourdes UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023
- Kettering Adventist Healthcare, d/b/a Kettering Health Network v. Sandra Collier, et al.; Epstein Becker & Green, PC, et al.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.