Legal Opinion

Tilcon-Warren Quarries Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 9, 1984PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.

The question presented by these two appeals is whether the business of quarrying and crushing stone and sand is “manufacturing,” as that term is used in G. L. c. 63, § 42B 1 and G. L. c. 59, § 5, Sixteenth (5). 2

The Appellate Tax Board (board) sustained the refusal of the Commissioner of Revenue (Commissioner) to classify the taxpayer as a manufacturing corporation for the years 1981 and 1982. We agree with the board’s substantive decision and do not reach the taxpayer’s argument that the board erred in dismissing its 1981 petition for lack of jurisdiction.

The taxpayer 3 is and was for the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. New Boston Garden Corp. v. Board of AssessorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Boston & Maine Railroad v. Town of BillericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  3. Duke Power Company v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Assessors of Boston v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  5. Byers v. Franklin Coal Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Revenue v. Houghton Mifflin Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. Ash Grove Cement Co. v. Nebraska Dept. of Rev.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Commissioner of Revenue v. J.C. Penney Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. William F. Sullivan & Co. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  5. Kobyluck Bros., LLC v. Planning & Zoning Comm'n of WaterfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API