Legal Opinion

William F. Sullivan & Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 3, 1992PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

Once again this court is called on to determine whether a particular business, in this case a scrap-metal processor, is engaged in “manufacturing” as that term is used in G. L. c. 59, § 5, Sixteenth (3) (1990 ed.)1 and G. L. c. 63, § 38C (1990 ed.).2 The dispute arose as follows: In July, 1985, the taxpayer, William F. Sullivan & Co., Inc. (Sullivan), filed Form 355Q, “Statement Relating to Manu*577factoring Activities,” with the Commissioner of Revenue (commissioner) requesting classification as a manufacturing corporation. Sullivan sought the manufacturing classification to qualify for certain…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boston & Maine Railroad v. Town of BillericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  2. Assessors of Boston v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  3. First Data Corp. v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Franki Foundation Co. v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  5. Joseph T. Rossi Corp. v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Revenue v. Houghton Mifflin Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. Onex Communications Corporation v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  3. Genentech, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  4. Noreast Fresh, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  5. Onex Communications Corp. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API