Legal Opinion

State v. Sopher

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1901No. 19,618PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From Hamilton Circuit Court; J. F. Neal, Judge. From a judgment acquitting William L. Sopher of the charge of selling intoxicating liquors, the State appeals on reserved questions of law.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

Appellee was prosecuted in the lower court for the crime of selling intoxicating liquors without being duly licensed according to the laws of this State. On a trial before a jury he was acquitted of the charge, and the court rendered its final judgment discharging him. The State, under §1915 Burns 1901, §1846 Horner 1897, reserved certain questions of law arising on the charge of the court to the jury, and by virtue of the provisions of section eight of an act of the legislature entitled “An act concerning appeals,” etc., approved March 12, 1901 (Acts 1901, p. 565), §1337h Burns 1901, this…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. RathboneSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Parvin v. WimbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Stout v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. State Board of Tax Commissioners v. HollidayIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Storms v. StevensIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. State v. EnsleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Barnes v. WagenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Darryl Calvin v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Wiggins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API