Legal Opinion

Stan Laber v. Merit Systems Protection Board

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided December 31, 1992No. 92-3481PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NIES, Chief Judge.

Stan Laber moves to dismiss his petition for review on the ground that the parties have settled. Laber further requests that we dismiss without prejudice to reinstatement in the event the government violates the settlement agreement.

When parties settle while a case is on appeal, the proper course is not to dismiss. It is to vacate the trial tribunal’s decision and to remand to the trial tribunal with instructions to dismiss. Smith Int'l, Inc. v. Hughes Tool Co., 839 F.2d 663 (Fed.Cir.1988); Gibraltar Indus., Inc. v. United States, 726 F.2d 747 (Fed.Cir.1984).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith International, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Hughes Tool Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Gibraltar Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. John G. Van Werry, Jr. v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API