Moutry v. American Mutual Liability Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.
The sole issue on this appeal is whether the automobile furnished Young was for his regular use.
The firmly established rules governing summary judgment have been set forth in detail in recent decisions 1 and need not be reiterated herein. Suffice it to say if the material facts are not in dispute and the inferences which may reasonably be drawn from such facts lead to but one conclusion, only a matter of law is presented which should be decided upon the motion for summary judgment. 2 Where issues are legal rather than factual summary judgment is proper. 3
Whether the automobile furnished Young…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Leszczynski v. SurgesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Bond v. HarrelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Pattermann v. City of WhitewaterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Iowa Mutual Insurance Company v. AddySupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
- Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BoecherOhio Court of Appeals · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lecus v. American Mutual Insurance Co. of BostonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. NegreteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- Hochgurtel v. San FelippoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. Government Employees Ins. Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
- Kunze v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.