Legal Opinion
In re Care & Treatment of Ritchie
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided May 1, 2020No. 121627PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
No. 121,627 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of RANDALL RITCHIE. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT The requirement in K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 59-29a08(k), that the court set a hearing within two working days of receipt of notice that a person in the Sexually Violent Predator Treatment Program has been returned from transitional release to the secure commitment facility, is directory, not mandatory. Appeal from Barton District Court; MIKE KEELEY, judge. Opinion filed May 1, 2020. Affirmed. Randall Ritchie, appellant pro se. Brant M. Laue, deputy solicitor…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Nauheim v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
- Wolfe Electric, Inc. v. DuckworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- Alliance Mortgage Co. v. PastineSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dwerlkotte v. HowardDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2022
- In re Care and Treatment of DwerlkotteCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021