Legal Opinion

Penn v. Schmisseur

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 31, 1898Published

Bill of Foreclosure.—Appeal from the Circuit" Court of St. Clair County; the Hon. Alonzo S. Wilderman, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Worthington

This case has been before the court, and is reported as Schmisseur v. Penn, 47 Ill. App. 279. After a full review of the facts and authorities, the court say; “ The easement was an incumbrance, and her right of way appurtenant is not included in the term highway as used in Sec. 10 of the conveyance act, and that incumbrance existing at the time of the delivery of the deed to the defendant by the complainant, the implied covenant existing in that deed by reason of the statute was broken on the delivery of the deed. See Wadham v. Swan, 109 Ill. 46; Christy v. Ogle’s Executors, 33 Ill. 295. And…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wadhams v. SwanIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Smyth v. NeffIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Tenney v. HemenwayIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Christy v. Ogle's ExecutorsIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Ogle v. TurpinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1881

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API