Legal Opinion

Smyth v. Neff

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1888PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Alexander county; the Hon. David J. Baker, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

This case was before this court.at a former term, and is reported as Neff v. Smyth, 111 Ill. 100. A sufficient statement of the facts appears in the opinion of the court then delivered, and no re-statement is now necessary.

It appears from the bill of exceptions in this case, the evidence in the present record is precisely the same as in the former record, except in two particulars: First, there is now some parol testimony concerning the service of the notice as to the expiration of the time of redemption of the lots from the tax sale, not contained in the former record; and second, there was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Newberry v. BlatchfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Hollowbush v. McConnelIllinois Supreme Court · 1850
  3. Ogden v. LarrabeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Rising v. CarrIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Neff v. SmythIllinois Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. West v. DouglasIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. First Lien Co. v. Marquette National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Foster v. MarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. People ex rel. First National Bank v. RusselIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Henning v. EldridgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1893

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API