Legal Opinion

Endicott Johnson Corp. v. Shapiro

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 27, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

I. This is an action for the recovery of specific personal property, to wit, a quantity of shoes purchased by Morris Shapiro, doing business at Sioux City, Iowa, under the name and style of the Chicago Shoe Store, by appellant, a New York corporation, engaged in the manufacture and sale of shoes and other leather goods at wholesale. Appellant alleged in its petition that the shoes were obtained by certain false and fraudulent representations by Shapiro as to his financial condition. A jury was waived, and the cause tried to the court, with the result that judgment was entered against the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. P. Cox Shoe Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Artz v. C., R. I. & P. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  3. First National Bank v. WaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  4. Morris v. PosnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  5. Palmer & Co. v. MerrillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. M. W. O'rieley, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Woerderhoff Shoe Co., Inc. v. Endicott-Johnson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  2. Homesteaders Life Assn. v. SalingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  3. Baker v. Roberts & BeierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  4. In re Woerderhoff Shoe Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API