Legal Opinion

Department of Labor & Industries v. Kantor

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 19, 1999No. 23030-5-IIPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.

— This case requires us to construe RCW 51.48.260, which allows the Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) to recover “any excess payments” it has made to a health care provider. We hold that the term “excess payments” includes payments that L&I previously made for services that were not “medically necessary.” We further hold that the statute authorizes L&I to suspend a health care provider’s eligibility to treat covered workers and to condition reinstatement upon successful completion of continuing medical education courses.

FACTS

Stanley Kantor, D.O., was the subject of an L&I audit. L&I…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Marley v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. RilesWashington Supreme Court · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Gallo v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  2. Bennerstrom v. DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRIESCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. Bennerstrom v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. Wells v. Olsten Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Wells v. Olsten Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API