Legal Opinion

Carre v. Seaman

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided February 15, 1937No. Nos. 287 & 288PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Layton, C. J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

The plaintiff, in his first action, seeks to hold the defendant liable, although her endorsement disclosed that she was acting in a representative capacity.

The parties do not seem to be in material disagreement with respect to questions of substantive law, for it is not denied that, prior to the enactment of the Negotiable Instrument Law (Rev. Code 1935, c. 78 [Section 3125 et seq.]) an executor making or endorsing a bill or note became personally liable, except, perhaps, in exceptional cases, either upon the instrument itself, or in an action…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schmittler v. . SimonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. New Georgia National Bank of Albany, Georgia v. J. & G. LippmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Harris v. WoodardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  4. Second National Bank v. Midland Steel Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Foster v. FeatherstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Akers v. SinclairWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc. v. ConnellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  3. Theisen v. HoeyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API