Legal Opinion

State ex rel. J. L. Isaacs Wall-Paper Co. v. William Barr Dry-Goods Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Leroy B. Y allí ant, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.

— Mrs. Kingsbury executed a chattel mortgage on her household goods January 13, 1888. The mortgage secured two promissory notes of even date for $285 and $875, respectively, and payable one day after date to the order of the wall-paper company, who is plaintiff in this suit. The instrument provided that the mortgagor niight remain in possession of the property until default, and that, in case of default and foreclosure by sale, the $285 note should first be paid out *98■of the proceeds and the other note next. The smaller note represented an indebtedness of Mrs. Kingsbury to the plaintiff, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Washburn v. Great Western InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Steinbach v. . Relief Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Thomas v. JoslinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  4. St. Louis Coffin Co. v. RubelmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. State ex rel. Meyrose v. LaurieMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HoffmannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API