Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Palacios v. Rea

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 6, 2002No. 00C-10960; A109434PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of his petition for writ of mandamus. As part of its judgment, the court required plaintiff to pay filing fees of $167, which the trial court had initially deferred pursuant to ORS 21.605(1)(a). Plaintiff challenges both the dismissal and the imposition of filing fees. We reject without discussion plaintiffs arguments as to the merits of the dismissal. However, as defendant concedes, the judgment for filing fees was erroneous. See State ex rel Baker v. Cook, 171 Or App 719, 16 P3d 1184 (2000).

Judgment for filing fees of $167 reversed;…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Baker v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bohanan v. AmsberryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API