Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Pogre

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided November 3, 1986No. Crim. A. No. 1748PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHAPMAN, P. J.

Statement of the Case.

Defendant, Catherine Pogre was charged in the Municipal Court, Santa Clara County Judicial District with a violation of Penal Code section 647, subdivision (b), which provides: “Every person who commits any of the following acts is guilty of disorderly conduct, a misdemeanor: ...(b) Who solicits ... or who engages in any act of prostitution____As used in this subdivision, ‘prostitution’ includes any lewd act between persons for money or other consideration.” She was also charged with having suffered a prior conviction for the same offense.

A jury…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. People v. ReillyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. BenfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Loder v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. In Re PodestoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. AdairCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. MatthewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. People v. BenavidesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. People v. ChagoyanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. People v. AdairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API