Legal Opinion

People v. Matthews

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1992No. B056602PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BOREN, J.

Introduction

In this case, we decide that respondent, a corporate president, did not carry his burden to show he was factually innocent of certain industry-related crimes and that the trial judge erred in granting respondent’s motion to seal and destroy his arrest records. We reverse.

Procedural Background

Diceon Electronics, Inc. (Diceon), a company which manufactures printed circuit boards, two of the company’s managers, and its president, respondent Roland G. Matthews, were charged in a twelve-count information which alleged the illegal disposal of hazardous waste (Health &…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. ParkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. People v. OverstreetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. People v. VogelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In Re JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. Jorge M.California Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. AdairCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. CoriaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API