Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Connolly

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado

Decided November 7, 1905No. 4,623PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

RINER, District Judge.

It is impossible to gather from the evidence in this case just what the contract or arrangement, under which the mines in controversy were developed, was between the parties iu interest, prior to the date of the written contract of August 13, 1900. The evidence shows, without conflict, that at the inception of the mining venture, out of which this controversy arises, the defendant Patrick Connolly had the possessor}- right to four mining claims at Eeadvillc, referred to in the evidence as the “Dolly B. Group”; that by some arrangement, made with his brother, Nichols K.,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rugan v. SabinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
  2. Wheeler v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Prima Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  2. Barnette v. Wells Fargo Nevada National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Cary v. HarrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
  4. Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. KeigCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  5. Brennan v. MonsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API