Legal Opinion

Vogel v. Tunick

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 14, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Anthony A. Scarping, Jr., J.

In an action for replevin pursuant to CPLR article 71 and other relief, transferred to this court by an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Feinman, J.) dated October 16, 2007, the plaintiffs move: (1) pursuant to CPLR 3124 to compel defendants Christie’s, Inc. and Sotheby’s, Inc. to comply with request Nos. 1 through 8 of their first notice for discovery, dated June 8, 2007, and (2) pursuant to CPLR 306-b to extend their time to serve the “John Doe” defendants until two months after the requested documents are produced.

At issue in this…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Leader v. Maroney, Ponzini & SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Parsa v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Guggenheim Foundation v. LubellNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. State v. Seventh Regiment Fund, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bumpus v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Marianne Hicks v. Leslie Feely Fine Art, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  3. Marianne Hicks v. Leslie Feely Fine Art, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API