Legal Opinion
State v. Seventh Regiment Fund, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 4, 2002PublishedCited by 110 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Kaye.
In this hotly-contested litigation, the State alleges that defendant, the Seventh Regiment Fund, Inc., is in wrongful pos session of valuable historic artifacts belonging to the State. The Fund maintains that the action is time-barred. The State counters that it is immune from the statute of limitations, and in any event that it sued soon enough after its cause of action accrued. We reject the State’s immunity argument but hold that its accrual arguments present issues of fact that render summary judgment improper. We therefore reverse the Appellate…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Vigilant Insurance of America v. Housing Authority of El PasoNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- General Stencils, Inc. v. ChiappaNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Sporn v. MCA Records, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Guggenheim Foundation v. LubellNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Lightfoot v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- Colavito v. New York Organ Donor Network, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Thyroff v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Lenard v. Design StudioDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Thyroff v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Chen v. New Trend Apparel, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.