Legal Opinion

Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. BilLingsley

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 28, 1919No. 94-2915PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSadler, J.

This action is in trespass to try title. On the trial of this case, there were two special issues submitted to the jury. One was on the question of the identity of Eduardo Arriola, the original grantee; the other was on defendant’s claim of title under the five years’ statute of limitation. The first was answered favorably to the contention of the plaintiff, Billingsley; the other favorably to the defendant. The court rendered judgment on these findings and the evidence for defendant. The plaintiff appealed. The defendant did not file motion to set aside the findings on the question of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tweed v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Tweed v. Western Union Telegraph CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Pollock v. Houston & Texas Central RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Billingsley v. Houston Oil Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kirby Lumber Corporation v. LindseyTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Price v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. McCarthy v. Houston Oil Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Harvey v. HumphreysCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. Houston Oil Company of Texas v. MossTexas Supreme Court · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API