Freed v. State

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

Michael Freed appeals his conviction for Class B felony robbery. Freed argues that the trial court erred by admitting evidence of his uncharged misconduct— specifically, an unrelated burglary, for gery, and solicitation for murder. We conclude that the evidence was properly admitted for the non-character purpose of corroborating Freed’s confession to the instant robbery. We further conclude that the record evidence is sufficient to sustain Freed’s conviction. We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

On July 6, 2008, at approximately 2:30 a.m., Freed entered a…