Legal Opinion

Lott v. Alexander

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided March 11, 2014No. 2013-CA-00104-COAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAIR, J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. This appeal arises from a chancellor’s order granting Robert and Annie Alexander visitation rights with their great-grandchildren under Mississippi Code Annotated section 93-16-3 (Rev.2013). Julia “Beth” Lott, the children’s mother and their daughter’s daughter, raises two issues on appeal: (1) the Alexanders do not have standing under section 93-16-3, and, in the alternative, (2) the chancellor erred in finding Lott unreasonably denied visitation. We find the first issue to be disposi-tive. We hold, consistent with the Legislature’s definition of “grandparent” and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Wallace v. Town of RaleighMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Hamner v. Yazoo Delta Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Stacy v. RossMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Martin v. CoopMississippi Supreme Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ed H. v. Ashley C., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. April Quen Garner v. Judi L. GarnerMississippi Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Parker v. Leaf River Cellulose, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API