Lott v. Alexander
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
FAIR, J.,
for the Court:
¶ 1. This appeal arises from a chancellor’s order granting Robert and Annie Alexander visitation rights with their great-grandchildren under Mississippi Code Annotated section 93-16-3 (Rev.2013). Julia “Beth” Lott, the children’s mother and their daughter’s daughter, raises two issues on appeal: (1) the Alexanders do not have standing under section 93-16-3, and, in the alternative, (2) the chancellor erred in finding Lott unreasonably denied visitation. We find the first issue to be disposi-tive. We hold, consistent with the Legislature’s definition of “grandparent” and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Wallace v. Town of RaleighMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
- Hamner v. Yazoo Delta Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1911
- Stacy v. RossMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
- Martin v. CoopMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ed H. v. Ashley C., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- April Quen Garner v. Judi L. GarnerMississippi Supreme Court · 2019
- Parker v. Leaf River Cellulose, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2014