Legal Opinion

Stacy v. Ross

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 2001No. 1999-CA-00579-SCT, 1999-CA-01725-SCTPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

798 So.2d 1275 (2001)

Delaine STACY and Sandy R. Stacy

v.

Williard Kenneth ROSS and Sue M. Ross.

Nos. 1999-CA-00579-SCT, 1999-CA-01725-SCT.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

October 31, 2001.

Walter E. Wood, Ridgeland, Attorney for Appellants.

Phil R. Hinton, Corinth, Attorney for Appellees.

EN BANC.

BANKS, Presiding Justice, for the Court:

¶ 1. Here we are faced with a question concerning grandparent visitation where there is a dispute between the natural parents whose marriage is intact and who have custody, and the maternal grandparents. We conclude that the trial court applied an erroneous standard in…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Reddell v. ReddellMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Bank of Mississippi v. HollingsworthMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Ethredge v. YawnMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Zeman v. StanfordMississippi Supreme Court · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Linder v. LinderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Corporate Management, Inc. v. Greene CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In Re Adoption of CaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  4. Townsend v. TownsendMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Glidden v. ConleySupreme Court of Vermont · 2003

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API