State v. Arghittu
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PEARCE, Judge:
T1 The State charged Richard Arghittu with distribution of a controlled substance analog, money laundering, and participating in a pattern of unlawful activity,. The charges stemmed from his alleged distribution of a form of synthetic marijuana known as AM-2201. After Arghittu's preliminary hearing, a district court judge, acting as a magistrate, concluded that AM-2201 was not an analog of the controlled substance JWH-018 as the State had alleged. The magistrate found probable cause to bind Arghittu over on one lesser, but uncharged, count of drug possession not involving…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. VirginUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. HolmUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BriggsUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. GallionUtah Supreme Court · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. AlehCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- State v. WarrenOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- State v. ReddenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022