Legal Opinion

State v. Arghittu

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided January 29, 2015No. 20130677-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PEARCE, Judge:

T1 The State charged Richard Arghittu with distribution of a controlled substance analog, money laundering, and participating in a pattern of unlawful activity,. The charges stemmed from his alleged distribution of a form of synthetic marijuana known as AM-2201. After Arghittu's preliminary hearing, a district court judge, acting as a magistrate, concluded that AM-2201 was not an analog of the controlled substance JWH-018 as the State had alleged. The magistrate found probable cause to bind Arghittu over on one lesser, but uncharged, count of drug possession not involving…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. VirginUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. HolmUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. BriggsUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. GallionUtah Supreme Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. AlehCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  2. State v. WarrenOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. State v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  4. State v. ReddenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API