Legal Opinion

Halliburton v. Collier

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 8, 1946No. 15587PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

The judgment in this case was for an abatement in the contract price for the purchase of described realty. It appears that the parties by agreement before trial disposed of the injunctive feature, and that no equitable relief was granted. Held: The judgment rendered was not in a suit “respecting title to land” within the provisions of art. 6, sec. 2, par. 4 of the Constitution of 1945. Such judgment was in a suit essentially an action at law for the recovery of the value of land. Grobli v. Foreman, 171 Ga. 712 (156 S. E. 622) ; Farkas v. Stephens, 181 Ga. 669 (183 S. E. 796) ;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gilbert Hotel No. 22 Inc. v. BlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Grobli v. ForemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  3. Henley v. Colonial Stages South Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  4. Farkas v. StephensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Halliburton v. CollierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  2. Standard Accident Insurance Company v. FowlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  3. Sanders v. CallowaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API