Legal Opinion

Dyer v. Hastings Industries, Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1997No. S-96-398PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Likes, D J.

Robert E. Dyer appeals from an order of affirmance on review by a Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court review panel affirming the trial court’s dismissal of Dyer’s action to recover workers’ compensation benefits for mental depression that arose concurrent to his employment with Hastings Industries, Inc. We affirm.

ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR

Restated, Dyer contends that the trial court erred by failing to find he was entitled to workers’ compensation benefits for the mental depression that arose during the course of his employment with Hastings.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

In determining whether to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Paulsen v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Cords v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Berggren v. Grand Island Accessories, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Wilson v. LARKINS & SONS & SONSNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Hale v. Standard Meat Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. US West Communications, Inc. v. TaborskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Owen v. American Hydraulics, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Zach v. Nebraska State PatrolNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Thach v. Quality Pork InternationalNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Cunningham v. Leisure InnNebraska Supreme Court · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API