Opinion of the Justices
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
• Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Court in response to questions propounded by the Senate under Code 1940, Tit. 13, § 34, as to the validity of a proposed substitute for' Senate Bill No. 279, amending Code 1940, Tit. 26, § 185.
SENATE RESOLUTION NO. 37 By Mr. Patton
WHEREAS, there is now pending in the Legislature of Alabama Senate Bill No. 279 for which a substitute is under consideration in a standing committee of this Body, a copy of which substitute is attached hereto ; and
WHEREAS, said substitute would amend Section 185, Title 26, 1940 Code as amended by adding a new paragraph to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- A. Magnano Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- New York Ex Rel. Hatch v. ReardonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Fox v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Moore v. Mobile Infirmary Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Smith v. SchulteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Pinto v. Alabama Coalition for EquitySupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Ex Parte MelofSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Morris v. Wallace Community College-SelmaDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.