Legal Opinion

Opinion of the Justices

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 13, 1949No. 102PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

• Opinion of the Justices of the Supreme Court in response to questions propounded by the Senate under Code 1940, Tit. 13, § 34, as to the validity of a proposed substitute for' Senate Bill No. 279, amending Code 1940, Tit. 26, § 185.

SENATE RESOLUTION NO. 37 By Mr. Patton

WHEREAS, there is now pending in the Legislature of Alabama Senate Bill No. 279 for which a substitute is under consideration in a standing committee of this Body, a copy of which substitute is attached hereto ; and

WHEREAS, said substitute would amend Section 185, Title 26, 1940 Code as amended by adding a new paragraph to…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. A. Magnano Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. New York Ex Rel. Hatch v. ReardonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Fox v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Moore v. Mobile Infirmary Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Smith v. SchulteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  3. Pinto v. Alabama Coalition for EquitySupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. Ex Parte MelofSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. Morris v. Wallace Community College-SelmaDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2001

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API