Legal Opinion
Conley v. Whittlesey
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided January 24, 1995No. 19993Published
1Opinion of the Court
888 P.2d 804 (1995)
126 Idaho 630
Dennis K. CONLEY, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellant,
v.
Craig D. WHITTLESEY, a single person; Gary Bishop and Norma Bishop, husband and wife, Defendants-Counterclaimants-Respondents, and
Richard Ward and Kelly Ward, husband and wife, Defendants-Respondents.
No. 19993.
Court of Appeals of Idaho.
January 24, 1995.
Dennis K. Conley, pro se.
Landeck, Westberg, Judge & Graham, P.A., Moscow, for respondents Whittlesey and Bishop. Charles L. Graham argued.
PERRY, Judge.
The subject of this litigation is an easement which was conveyed to Dennis Conley in 1980 by the grantors…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- General Signal Corporation v. Donallco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Rex L. Shuffler and Betty L. Shuffler v. Heritage Bank, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Universal Athletic Sales Co., a Corporation v. Larry Salkeld Appeal of Donald E. PinchockCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.