Nault v. West Bend Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.
¶ 1. Henry and Lisa Nault 1 appeal a summary judgment holding their West Bend Mutual Insurance Company umbrella policy does not provide excess underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage. They argue the policy is contextually ambiguous. They also contend the court should have held there was coverage because West Bend failed to give proper notice of the availability of excess UIM coverage in violation of Wis. Stat. § 632.32(4m). 2
¶ 2. We agree with the circuit court's determination that the West Bend umbrella policy is not contextually ambiguous. However, we conclude Wis. Stat. § 632.32(4m) required…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Folkman v. QuammeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Oelhafen v. Tower Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Etter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008