Legal Opinion

Etter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 15, 2008No. 2008AP113PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.

¶ 1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company appeal a summary judgment against them totaling $483,064.17. State Farm argues the circuit court erred by holding that Robert and Antoinette Etters' (collectively, with the Estate of Robert Etter, "the Etters") personal liability umbrella policy provided uninsured motorist coverage. We agree and reverse the judgment.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2. Robert Etter was a police officer for the Village of Hobart. While on duty on July 22, 2002, he was in a parked squad car with another officer when Tyson Kreuscher drove his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. ESTATE OF SUSTACHE v. American Family Mutual Insurance CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Shannon v. ShannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Frost Ex Rel. Anderson v. WhitbeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Liebovich v. Minnesota InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Acuity v. BagadiaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wadzinski v. Auto-Owners InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Wadzinski v. Auto-Owners InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API