Legal Opinion
Flight Sciences, Inc. v. Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 18, 2009No. 07 Civ. 2830VMPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Flight Sciences, Inc. (“FSI”) brought this action against defendant Cathay Pacific Airways Limited (“CPAL”) for breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unjust enrichment, and misappropriation of trade secrets. CPAL now moves for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 (“Rule 56”), alleging that FSI’s claims are barred by the relevant statutes of limitations. For the reasons discussed below, CPAL’s motion is DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND 1
On April 17, 1997, CPAL and FSI executed a Fuel…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Abbas v. DixonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matana v. MerkinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Boehner v. HeiseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Heise II v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)District Court, N.D. New York · 2021
- Malon v. MitolaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019