Palmer v. State

OPINION

DUNN, Justice.

The trial court found appellant, David Barrett Palmer, guilty of possession of a controlled substance, namely cocaine weighing less than 28 grams. The court assessed punishment at eight-years probation and a $1,000 fine. We affirm.

In his sole point of error, appellant contends there was insufficient evidence to prove his knowing possession of the controlled substance beyond a reasonable doubt.

In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the judgment. Flournoy v. State, 668 S.W.2d 380, 388…