United States v. Nicholas J. Cicco Vincent Tabbachino
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:
I
The United States appeals from an order acquitting the defendants on two counts of a multicount indictment after a jury had returned guilty verdicts as to those counts. The district court ruled that, as applied to the indictment before it, 18 U.S.C. § 666 was ambiguous. It applied the rule of lenity and concluded that defendants’ conduct was outside the ambit of the statute. Alternatively, the court ruled that the government’s interpretation of § 666 was unconstitutionally vague. We have jurisdiction over the government’s appeal from the district…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Berman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Nathaniel Coleman, A/K/A "Boo Tee Coleman", Anthony Del Bono, A/K/A "Nonnie Del Bono"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- United States v. William Del Toro and William KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Chrysler Credit Corporation v. First National Bank And Trust Company Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. NewellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Daniel M. Paradies, the Paradies Shops, Inc., Paradies Midfield Corporation, Ira JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- United States v. James Ned GrubbCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Brigido Marmolejo, Jr. And Mario SalinasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. John Vitillo, Vitillo Corporation and Vitillo Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.