Legal Opinion

In re Townsend Growth Fund, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 25, 1965PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS F. MURPHY, District Judge.

These are applications for allowances in a Chapter X proceeding that has been unusually successful. The matter of allowances was the subject of a prior memorandum of the court, dated October 29, 1964. Certain interim dispositions were made therein and the matter was continued because:

“* * * The unanimously expressed gratification with the unusual success in administration of the estate seemed marred only by the necessity of paying the cost of its accomplishment. That thankless task and disagreeable duty must be discharged by the court without ‘vicarious…

2Cases cited8 opinions

Magruder v. DrurySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
Finn v. Childs Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
In Re North American Light & Power Co. Securities & Exchange Commission v. MastersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
In re North American Light & Power Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1951
Matter of Engineers Public Service Company. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Guggenheimer & Untermyer, Louis Boehm, and Raymond L. WiseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Securities & Exchange Commission v. S & P National Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967