Legal Opinion

Konopski v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1978No. Appeal, No. 1302 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Wilkinson, Jr;,

This is an appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirming, after the Board took additional testimony through a Hearing Officer, the order of the referee denying benefits to petitioner (claimant) pursuant to Section 402(b) (1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law *64(Law)1 (voluntary termination of work without cause of necessitous and compelling nature). We affirm.

Claimant was employed by Lemmon Pharmacal Company (Lemmon) .in. the newly created position of telephone sales representative, earning a final salary of $125 per…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Deiss v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Tollari v. Unempl. Comp. Bd. of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Elshinnawy v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Baldassano v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Raham v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Goldman v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Farley v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Anthony v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API