Legal Opinion

W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Warrington

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided March 14, 1938No. Action of Assumpsit, No. 37PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harrington, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

The question raised by the demurrer is whether, under the facts alleged, Clarence E. Abbott and Robert H. Swain can be joined as defendants in an action against Stephen Warrington on the contract executed by him and declared on by the plaintiff.

The answer to that question largely depends on whether, under their contract, Abbott and Swain are sureties for Warrington, or merely guarantors of the obligations assumed by him.

The defendants, also, claim, however, that in any aspect of the case the contract with the .plaintiff, signed by Abbott and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Northern State Bank v. BellamyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Eising v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  3. Watkins Medical Co. v. MarbachCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Bernd v. LynesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  5. Brown v. MelloonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bence v. Pacific Power and Light Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Bence v. Pacific Power and Light Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API