Legal Opinion

Jones v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1988No. 53818PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMEONE, Senior Judge.

The issue presented in this appeal by the State of Missouri is whether, in the absence of any claim of ineffectiveness of counsel, the movant-respondent was not afforded her constitutional right to counsel for the sole reason that her retained attorney was not duly “licensed” at the time of her guilty plea and sentence because the attorney failed to pay his bar dues in compliance with Rule 6.01 and was thus suspended from the practice of law.

The trial court, after an evidentiary hearing, made findings of fact and conclusions of law that “movant was not afforded the right…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. VanderpoolNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Shaw v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. ThibeaultMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
  4. Thrasher v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Scott v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API