Hogan v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWedell, J.
I dissent from the statement of law contained in the first paragraph of the syllabus and from the corresponding portion of the opinion. In my opinion any injury which deprives a human being of an existing privilege or of a definite existing enjoyment of life, robs the individual of a right, the loss of which is compensable.
It should be noted on the outset the enjoyment in the instant case was not an imaginary enjoyment. It was a fixed and definite enjoyment which existed at the time of the injury. Nor did it constitute an incidental or merely occasional enjoyment. It was an enjoyment which…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Columbus v. StrassnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Gibbard v. EvansWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
- Nees v. Julian Goldman Stores, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1930
- Kramer v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Budek v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.