Legal Opinion

Mohawk Lumber & Supply Co. v. Petix

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1957No. Docket 9, Calendar 46,982PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtVoelker, J.

(for reversal). Tlie plaintiff filed its bill of complaint to foreclose a mechanics’ lien against the Oakland county premises of the defendants Petix, for materials furnished the defendant contractor Bloomfield Homes, Inc., in building a house thereon. The bill was founded on 2 separate items and the plaintiff alleged in its sworn bill of complaint that it caused “to be served on the defendants, Samuel C. Petix and Agatha Petix, his wife, a true copy of each of said statements of account and lien in accordance with the law in such case made and provided.”.

In their sworn answer to this…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Morris v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Maslen v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. In Re Estate of FraserMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Warner v. NobleMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rasmussen v. Bolyard Lumber Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API