Legal Opinion

Rosenbaum v. S-M-S 32

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 15, 1993No. 23820PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finney, Justice:

In this action to clear title, the circuit court struck from Appellant S-M-S 32’s counterclaim, inter alia, the assertion of an Action of Trespass to Try Title and denied appellant’s motion for a jury trial. We affirm.

Respondent Barbara H. Rosenbaum bought the subject real estate, a condominium formerly owned by the appellant, at a Beaufort County tax sale in October, 1989. In December of 1990, respondent instituted this action pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 12-61-10, et seq. (1976), seeking a declaration of clear title. See S.C. Code Ann. § 12-61-20 (1976).

Appellant answered by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Browning Ex Rel. Estate of Browning v. HartvigsenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Horn v. Davis Electrical Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Johnson v. South Carolina National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  4. Bryan v. FreemanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  5. Van Every v. Chinquapin Hollow, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stephen v. Avins Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Richland County School District Two v. South Carolina Department of EducationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Russo v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Auto Now Acceptance Corp. v. Catawba InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Auto Now Acceptance Corp. v. Catawba InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API