Legal Opinion

Starr v. Sperry

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 13, 1918PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Polk District Court. — Hubert Utterback, Judge. Action to recover damages consequent on the falling of a radiator in defendant’s building on plaintiff’s foot. From judgment against her, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

The plaintiff, at the time in question, was employed as a press feeder by the National Printing Company. Its shop was on the second floor of defendant’s building. In the morning of April 1, 1916, he passed along the hallway to the entrance therefrom into said shop; and, as the door was fastened, turned back; and, as he passed a radiator in the hallway against the wall or partition, a few feet from the door, it toppled over and crushed his- foot. It was not connected with the heating system, but had been removed from the company’s room in October, 1915, by the company or its landlord, Chiesca,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Looney v. McLeanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  2. Lowell v. StrahanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  3. Flanagan v. WelchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  4. Burner v. Higman & Skinner Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  5. Farley v. ByersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hogsett v. HannaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Stupka v. ScheidelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  3. Chambers v. LoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. Primus v. Bellevue ApartmentsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  5. Hull v. Bishop-Stoddard CafeteriaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API