Legal Opinion

Farr v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 17, 1956No. Gen. 10,886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eovaddi

For a second time, this case comes to our Court. In the first appeal judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $6,250 was set aside for the failure of the trial court to withdraw from the jury the wilful and wanton counts of the complaint (3 Ill.App.2d 209 (Abst.)). In the second trial the jury again returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff, this time in the sum of $3,250, upon which the court entered the judgment from which this appeal is taken.

Originally there were four counts in the complaint, but on the second trial the case went to the jury on Count II, the other counts having been…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lindroth v. Walgreen Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. HansenIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Weinstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Bonnier v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. GundersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hartman v. Goldblatt Bros., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  2. Stegmann v. ZachariahAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  3. Zokhrabov v. ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  4. Zokhrabov v. Jeung-Hee ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API