Legal Opinion

Oliver v. Martin

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 3, 1983PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VIOLETTE, Justice.

In February 1979, plaintiff Oliver began this action against Martin for assault. Two years later, Martin was ordered defaulted for his failure to file a timely responsive pre-trial memorandum. After a hearing on damages in Superior Court, Cumberland County, judgment was entered for compensatory and punitive damages against Martin. On appeal, Martin raises several alleged errors. We vacate the judgment and remand for a new hearing on punitive damages.

First, Martin objects to being defaulted. Maine Rule of Civil Procedure 16 generally requires a party to file a responsive…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vicnire v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. Frost v. LuceySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  3. Sheepscot Land Corp. v. GregorySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. Reeves v. Travelers Insurance CompaniesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  5. Comber v. Inhabitants of Plantation of DennistownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. RaymondSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  2. Hanover Insurance Co v. HaywardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  3. Colony Cadillac & Oldsmobile, Inc. v. YerdonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  4. Finn v. LipmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  5. Pelletier v. PathirajaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API