Molina v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANNHEIMER, Judge.
Ricardo Molina was convicted of felony driving under the influence-that is, driving under the influence when he had two or more prior convictions for DUI or breath-test refusal within the preceding ten years.1 To prove the predicate prior convictions, the State relied on a prior DUI conviction that Molina had in Arizona.
AS 28.35.080(t)(4)(A) declares that a DUI conviction from another state counts as a prior conviction for purposes of Alaska's felony DUI statute if the other state's DUI law has elements that are "similar" to the elements of DUI under Alaska law-that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. MoralesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Hart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
- Hasten v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. NobleOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Weston v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Garcia v. Vitus Energy, LLCDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2022
- Joshua William Converse v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2025