Legal Opinion

Molina v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided June 20, 2008No. A-9570PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

Ricardo Molina was convicted of felony driving under the influence-that is, driving under the influence when he had two or more prior convictions for DUI or breath-test refusal within the preceding ten years.1 To prove the predicate prior convictions, the State relied on a prior DUI conviction that Molina had in Arizona.

AS 28.35.080(t)(4)(A) declares that a DUI conviction from another state counts as a prior conviction for purposes of Alaska's felony DUI statute if the other state's DUI law has elements that are "similar" to the elements of DUI under Alaska law-that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. MoralesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  2. Hart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  3. Hasten v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State v. NobleOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Weston v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Vitus Energy, LLCDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2022
  2. Joshua William Converse v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API