Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 2011No. 20090659PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice DURHAM,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

1 1 Terry Johnson appeals the dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief He argues that the district court erred in dismissing his petition without reaching the merits of his claims, which included challenges to his counsel's effectiveness and to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction. We conclude that the district court correctly dismissed Mr. Johnson's petition because his claims were either frivolous, previously adjudicated, or procedurally barred by statute. We therefore affirm the district court's order…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. LitherlandUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Gardner v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Carter v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Kell v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Meadow Valley Contractors, Inc. v. State Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. R.C.S. v. A.O.L.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Ross v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Oseguera v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Gordon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  5. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API