Legal Opinion · Concurrence

STATE v. KEEFE

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 31, 2017No. Case Number: S-2015-961Published

1Concurrence

LEWIS, V.P.J.:

CONCURRING IN RESULTS:

¶ 1 While the majority reaches the correct result, the rationale limits the Court’s holding in State v. Kieffer-Roden, 2009 OK CR 18, 208 P.3d 471; therefore, I concur in results only. In the present case, the trial court simply failed to follow the precedential nature of Kieffer-Roden, thus the trial court abused its discretion.

¶ 2 A police officer acting outside his jurisdiction may make an arrest for a public offense committed in the presence of the officer just as a private citizen authorized by 22 O.S.2011, § 202. Kieffer-Roden, 2009 OK CR 18, ¶ 10,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
  2. Moran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Staller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. Nickell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
  5. Phipps v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API