Flynn v. City of Detroit
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Bill to quiet title. Defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This bill is filed to quiet title.
The land in controversy is a strip 4.97 feet in width in •front of, and claimed by complainants to be a part of, lot 66 of section 7 of the Governor and Judges* plan of the city of Detroit. This lot, as platted, is situated on the corner of Barclay Place and John B. street. Complainants derived their title through Hugh Flynn, deceased, who was the husband of Ann Flynn, the other complainants being: the children of Hugh and Ann Flynn. Hugh Flynn derived his title under a deed from Angelica Ohapaton, made March 11, 1846, describing the land as—
“All that part of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rogers v. SnowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- People v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1849
- City of Big Rapids v. ComstockMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by7 opinions
- Weber v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Gildea v. WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Pastorino v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Schneider v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Leonard v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.